Compare BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) VS CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR

Are you looking for the perfect tyre for your tractor but confused between BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) and CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR? We will help you resolve your confusion by comparing these two models. The BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) is a Rear tyre available in a size of not available, whereas the CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR is a Rear tyre available in a size of 16.90 X 30. The warranty offered on the BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) is not available, while the warranty period of CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR is 7 years The ply rating of BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) is 12 PR. On the other hand, the CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR ply rating is 12 PR.

Moreover, the key specifications of these two tractor tyre models, which can help you make an informed decision, are listed below:

BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) vs CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR

Key Highlights BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR
Position Rear Rear
Size 16.90 X 30
Ply Rating 12 PR 12 PR
Construction Type Bias Bias
Warranty (Years) 7
Read More

BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) VS CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR

BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) Tyre
BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) Get More Details
VS CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR Tyre
CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR Get More Details
VS
BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R)
7

Yrs
Certified
CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR
BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R)
CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR

Specifications

Brand BKT CEAT
Model 9.5-20 Commander (R) 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR
Vehicle Type Tractor Tractor
Position Rear Tyre Rear Tyre
Size 9.5 X 20 16.90 X 30
Rim Size (inch) 20 30
Version Standard
PR (Ply Rating) 12 12
Construction Type Bias Bias
Rim Rec (Rim Recommended) / Rim W 8 W15L
Rim Alt W 8 W15L

Dimensions

Section Width (SW) mm/inch 245 435/17
OD (Overall Diameter) mm/inch 970 1500/59
SLR (Static Loaded Radius) mm/inch 455 673/26
RC (Rolling Circumference) mm/inch 2953 4415/174

Load Capacity

Inflation Pressure psi 43.51 35
Max Load (kg) 1030 2800
SS (Speed Symbol) A6 A6
LI (Load Index) 109 144
Warranty (Years) 7

Other Popular Tyre Comparisons

VS
GOOD YEAR 16.9-28 Sampurna Tyre
GOOD YEAR 7.50-16 Vajra Super Tyre
GOODYEAR
16.9-28 Sampurna
Size - 16.90 X 28
GOODYEAR
7.50-16 Vajra Super
Size - 7.50 X 16
VS
BKT 13.6-28 Commander (R) Tyre
GOOD YEAR 13.6-28 Sampurna Tyre
BKT
13.6-28 Commander (R)
Size - 13.60 X 28
GOODYEAR
13.6-28 Sampurna
Size - 13.60 X 28
VS
7

Yrs
Certified
CEAT 6.00-16 Aayushmaan F2 Tyre
APOLLO 6.00-16 Krishak Gold Steer Tyre
CEAT
6.00-16 Aayushmaan F2
Size - 6.00 X 16
APOLLO
6.00-16 Krishak Gold Steer
Size - 6.00 X 16

Other Tyre Brands

Frequently Asked Questions On BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) VS CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR

1. Which among the two models BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) and CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR is best?

Both the tyre models are the best and you can choose one as per your need and budget.
The BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) has a rim measuring 20 inch and the CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR has a rim measuring 30 inch.
The warranty period of BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) is not available and that of CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR is 7 Year .
The BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) Bias type and that of CEAT 16.9-30 Aayushmaan R1 12 PR is Bias type
You can get the updated information on both the tyre models at Tractorkarvan.
X

View Latest Offer On BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) Tractor

X

View Latest Offer On BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) Tractor

Enter the OTP we have sent you on your mobile no. XXXXXXXX97 Change
Didn't receive? Resend OTP
X

View Latest Offer On BKT 9.5-20 Commander (R) Tractor

Success!
success check icon
Thank you for your enquiry!
We will get back to you soon.
Close
Close

Call Us At

+91-8925-8521-29
Disclaimer: Tractorkarvan is providing indepth & well-researched information on the farm machineries. It is involved only in sourcing leads for TVS Credit products and 'Tractor Karvan' does not directly facilitate the purchase and sale of vehicles and agricultural implements as a 'live marketplace' and nor provide loans directly.